Cover
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2011)

Published: May 31, 2011

Pages: 135-146

Original Article

Study of the Effect of Ferric Chloride Concentrations and pH on Organic Matter Removal Percentage in Al-Dewanyia Water Treatment Plant

Abstract

Supplying drinking water in Al-Dewanyia city to meet Iraqi Drinking Water Guidelines is a challenge as source waters contain high concentrations of Natural Organic Matter (NOM) that often exceed 12 mg/L Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC). The US EPA indicates that enhanced coagulation is the best available technology to control DOC in drinking water treatment plants. A water director of Al-Qadissiya has used enhanced coagulation at Al-Dewanyia Water Treatment Plants (WTP’s) in Iraq since 2004 to improve water quality in the distribution system. NOM reduction has led to treated water with a lower chlorine demand allowing a greater residual penetration enabling improved bacteriological compliance. Since the cost of DOC (and Disinfection by-product DBPs) determination was high, it was decided to study the traditional analysis of COD as a surrogate measure to detect the organic constituents in raw water and the extent to which optimized coagulation with ferric chloride can increase COD removal. The water samples studied belonged to Al-Dewanyia River. For samples the observed values of COD removal by coagulation at lower pH (about 1-1.5 pH values less than the regular pH (5.8 ~ 8.5)) were about 85-95 percent without making water turbidity unacceptable. In order to determine the effects of organic content on coagulation, The results indicated that a modified coagulation process without need to much increasing the amount of coagulant can be developed for these water samples.

References

  1. Bachi, A., E. Puech-Coste, R. Ben Aim and J.L. Probst. Mathematical modelling of optimum coagulant dose in water treatment plant, Revue Des Sciences De L’eau. 3, 377-397, 1990.
  2. Ellis, G.W., A.G. Collins, Xi Ge and C.R. Ford Chemical dosing of small water utilities using regression analysis, J. Environ. Engng. 117(3), 308-319, 1991.
  3. Girou, A., M. Franceschi, E. Puech-Costes and L. Humbert. Modelisation des phenomenes de coagulation et etude de la morphologie des flocs : optimisation du taux de coagulant, Recents Prog. Genie Procedes 6(20), 373-385, 1992.
  4. Ratnaweera, H., and H. Blom. Optimisation of coagulant dosing control using real- time models selective to instrument errors, Water Supply 13(3/4), 285-289, 1995.
  5. van Leeuwen, J., C.W.K. Chow, D. Bursill and M. Drikas. Empirical mathematical models and artificial neural networks for determination of alum doses for treatment of southern Australian surface waters, J. Water SRT-Aqua 48(3) 115-127, 1999a.
  6. Edwards, M. Predicting DOC removal during enhanced coagulation. J. AWWA 89(5) 78-89. 2003.
  7. Urfer, D., P. M. Huck, G. A. Gagnon, D. Mutti and F. Smith. Modeling enhanced coagulation to improve ozone disinfection, J. AWWA. 91(3) 59-73, 1999.
  8. Baxter, C. W., Stanely, S. J. and Zhang, Q. Development of a full-scale artificial neural network model for the removal of natural organic matter by enhanced coagulation. J Water SRT – Aqua 48(4) 129-136, 1999.
  9. Ghaly, A.E., A. Snow and B.E. Faber. 2007. Effective coagulation technology for treatment of grease filter washwater. Am. J. Environ. Sci., 3: 19-29. DOI: 3844/ajessp.2007.19.29
  10. Guida, M., M. Mattei, C. Della Rocca, G. Melluso and S. Meric,. Optimization of alumcoagulation/ flocculation for COD and TSS removal from five municipal wastewater. Desalination, 211: 113-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.086
  11. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. January, National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress Reporting Cycle. EPA 841-R-08-001. Washington, DC. 2009.
  12. APHA, AWWA, WPCF,. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, APHA, 19th Ed, Washington. 1995.