Cover
Vol. 23 No. 2 (2023)

Published: December 31, 2023

Pages: 72-77

Original Article

Effect of Retained Austenite on the Microstructure and Micro-Hardness of AISI 4330 Low Alloy Steel Using X-Ray Diffraction method

Hadeel K. Abdul Reda 1 Haider M. Mohammad 2
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq
2 Department of Material Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq
History
  • Received: January 23, 2023
  • Revised: February 26, 2023
  • Accepted: March 4, 2023
  • Available Online: December 30, 2023
DOI

https://doi.org/10.33971/bjes.23.2.9

Abstract

The mechanical properties of low alloy steel are significantly influenced by retained austenite (RA). Consequently, using the X-Ray diffraction (XRD) measurement method, the retained Austenite volume fractions in AISI4330 alloy steel have been assessed in this article. The specimens underwent heat treatment at various heating temperatures (800 ֯ C, 900 ֯ C,1000 ֯ C) and cooling rates (Water and Oil). The findings demonstrate that retained Austenite formation rises with rising heating (Austenitizing) temperatures for the same quenching media as well as with rising cooling rates. The specimens were heated to a temperature of 1000 °C and then quenched in water, yielding the highest amount of retained austenite (7.733 wt%), and the lowest amount (1.977 wt%), which was obtained when the specimens were heated to a temperature of 800 °C and quenched in oil. The Vickers method was employed to conduct micro-hardness testing, and the results demonstrate that hardness values are reduced as heating temperatures increase. Optical microscopy was used to investigate the effects of retained austenite on the microstructure. The results show that bainite and/or martensite phases with a small amount of retained austenite dominate the microstructure at low cooling rates, whereas martensite and retained austenite phases dominate the microstructure at higher heating and cooling rates.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Chandler, Metallurgy for the Non-Metallurgist, ASM International (1998).
  2. N. Pappas, T.R. Watkins, O.B. Cavin, R.A. Jaramillo, G.M. Ludtka, Retained Austenite in SAE 52100 Steel Post Magnetic Processing and Heat Treatment, Proceedings on Materials Processing under the Influence of External Fields, Edited by Q. Han, G. M. Ludtka and Q. Zhai, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (2007) 37–42.
  3. A. N. Vasilakos, J. Ohlert, K. Giasla, G. N. Haidemenopoulos, and W. Bleck, “Low-alloy TRIP steels: A correlation between mechanical properties and the retained austenite stability,” Steel Res., vol. 73, no. 6–7, pp. 249–252, 2002, doi: 10.1002/srin.200200204.
  4. M. A. Jabbar, " Effect of Retained Austenite on Tensile Strength and Hardness of Low Alloy Steels Using Artificial Neural Networks", University of Basra, Department of Mechanical Engineering , PP. 1-75 , 2010.
  5. Z.A.Hamza, H.M.Moammed, M.A. Jabbar, “Effect of Quenching and Tempering Treatments on Impact Strength and Fatigue Life of AISI 4340, ” University of Basra, Department of Mechanical Engineering , pp. 2075-9746, 2015.
  6. H. Matsuda, H. Noro, Y. Nagataki, and Y. Hosoya, “Effect of retained austenite stability on mechanical properties of 590MPa grade TRIP sheet steels,” Mater. Sci. Forum, vol. 638–642, pp. 3374–3379, 2010, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.638-642.3374.
  7. L. Zhao, N. H. Van Dijk, E. Brück, J. Sietsma, and S. Van Der Zwaag, “Magnetic and X-ray diffraction measurements for the determination of retained austenite in TRIP steels,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 313, no. 1–2, pp. 145–152, 2001, DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)00965-0.
  8. J. Pechousek, L. Kouril, P. Novak, J. Kaslik, and J. Navarik, “Austenitemeter – Mössbauer spectrometer for rapid determination of residual austenite in steels,” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 131, pp. 671–676, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.028.
  9. K. K. Wang, Z. L. Tan, G. H. Gao, X. L. Gui, and B. Z. Bai, “Effect of retained austenite stability on mechanical properties of bainitic rail steel,” Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 1004– 1005, pp. 198–202, 2014, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1004-1005.198.
  10. M. Morawiec and A. Grajcar, “Some aspects of the determination of retained austenite using the Rietveld refinement,” J. Achieve. Mater. Manuf. Eng., vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2017, DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.1442.
  11. ASTM , "Standard practice for x – ray determination of retained austenite is steel with near random crystallographic orientation" , Annual Book of ASTM standard E975 – 3, ASTM International , 2007.
  12. ASTM , "standard test methods, practices, terminology for chemical analysis of steel products" , Annual Book of ASTM standard A751 – 01, ASTM International , 2001.
  13. ASTM, "standard test methods and definition for mechanical testing of steel products" , Annual Book of ASTM standard A370 – 02, ASTM International , 2002.
  14. ASTM , "Standard practice for x – ray determination of retained austenite is steel with near random crystallographic orientation" , Annual Book of ASTM standard E975 – 3, ASTM International , 2007.
  15. T. Materials, “The Materials Information Company,” Technology, vol. 2, p. 3470, 2001, DOI: 10.1016/S00260576(03)90166-8.
  16. R. P. Division and N. Delhi, “W W W En Te Ch No L Og Y . W En Te Ch No Og,” 1980.
  17. ASTM Standard E92-82, “ASTM E92-82 Standard Test Method for Vickers Hardness of Metallic Materials,” Annu. B. ASTM Stand. 4, vol. 82, no. Reapproved, pp. 1–27, 1997.
  18. ASTM E 407-99, “E407-07: Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys,” ASTM Int. West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 1–21, 1999.
  19. Joseph Lucas, "Re magnetization of Magnetos", Lucas Quality Equipment, section D-6, Vol.2, PP.1-8, 1952.
  20. ASM Handbook , "Heat treating" , American Society for Metals , Vol.4, Metals Park, Ohio, USA, 2002.