×
The submission system is temporarily under maintenance. Please send your manuscripts to
Go to Editorial ManagerIn this study, loading was carried out for several types of perforated plates, such as circular, rhombic and rectangular holes, where the holes were arranged in two types, namely straight arrangement and alternating arrangement. The stress intensity factor and shape factor were calculated for each case, taking into account the diameter of the holes. So, it is found the SIF increases significantly when the plate is perforated, and the same applies to the shape factor, also increases. In the case of circular holes, the increases in the average value of (SIF) reached to (80.88 %) when the plate was perforated with alternated arranged of circular holes, while the straight arrangement of circular holes the increases of average values of SIF reach to (67.55 %). Either in the case of rhombus holes: the SIF values are increases to (51.07 %) when the plate was perforated with the alternated arrangement, while in the straight arrangement of holes the (SIF) increase to (35.43 %). It was observed through this study, the increases of stress intensity factor and the shape factor with different crack lengths were more stable in the plate that perforated with an alternated arrangement of holes than the straight arrangement. The higher values of stress intensity factor obtained when the plates were perforated with circular holes, due to the circular shape has more stiffness, so the Absorption of force will be small Compared with the rhombus and rectangular shape that will be less stiffness which the absorption of strength is greater.
The ultimate objective of this study was to compare the performance of repaired edge cracks in steel plates before and after repair with patches made of steel patch and glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite patches (GFRP) in different shapes: circular, rectangular, and trapezoidal, under two conditions: unsymmetric patch (one patch) and symmetric patch (two patches). A three-dimensional finite element model of the one-sided and two-sided repaired examples is used to study how the steel and composite patch affect the stress intensity factor (SIF). Under uniaxial tensile loads, the use of steel patches and GFRP composite patches to repair cracks was studied. The results showed that the steel patch performs better than the GFRP patch because it significantly lowers the stress intensity factor (SIF). The symmetric patch arrangement (two patches) is better than the un-symmetric patch arrangement (one patch) because it significantly reduces the stress intensity factor (SIF).
This paper presents the effect of fiber orientation angle on the stress intensity factor SIF for carbon epoxy composite plates with single-edge, center, and inclined cracks of varying lengths under tensile load. The stress intensity factor and shape factor were calculated individually for each case, with nine different fiber orientation angles computed using the extended finite element method XFEM concepts. It is found the stress intensity factor increases with increasing crack lengths while the shape factor decreases. In the case of single edge cracks, the SIF increases in the average value reached (173 %) for composite plates with different fiber orientation angles, while in the case of the center crack, the average value of SIF reaches (81 %). It was observed in this study that the increases in stress intensity factor and the decreases in the shape factor with different crack lengths were more stable in the composite plate with a fiber orientation angle of 75°. The higher values of SIF at an angle of 75° are because of the high probability of fiber slippage at 75° due to induced shear stresses in addition to the tensile stresses at the fiber-matrix interface. As a result, the crack tip has a high-stress intensity factor.
Due to the significance of structural sandwiches with hexagonal cores, utilized in various applications including aerospace, marine industries, and rail transport, and their design that imparts superior strength compared to conventional forms. In this paper, fracture behavior of these structural sandwiches was examined. Initially, the equivalent modulus of elasticity was empirically determined for many cell side lengths, utilizing the stress-strain relationship derived from tensile tests on hexagonal specimens. The fracture behavior was analyzed numerically using Abaqus software. The core and the complete sandwich structure were examined under various loads, including tensile and shear forces. The influence of the hexagonal cell dimensions on the fracture modules and the stress intensity factor (SIF), was assessed. It was observed that when the cell thickness remains constant while the side length varies, the SIF increases with the increasing in side length. This leads to the influence of stiffness, where it decreases with the increase in side length of the cell core. For instance, when the side length is 10, the stress intensity factor is 4.821, while when the side length is 20, the stress intensity factor becomes 22.35. A relationship was found between the stress intensity factor and thickness, similar to the tension case. However, here, a relationship between (kl) and the (a/tc) ratio was established.
The purpose of this paper is to determine a stress intensity factor experimental and numerically in the linear region by using a CT specimen of ductile material with a thickness of 15 mm, a width of 30 mm, and pre-crack 1.3 mm this dimension according to ASTM-E399-12 [1], by pulling the specimen in a 600 kN universal testing machine at a very slow speed rate of 0.5 mm/min. The load is applied until the fracture is accrued, the computer-controlled universal testing machine gives the value of the load and the displacement transducer gives a crack mouth opening displacement. The result showed experimental K I is equal to 75.412 MPa √ m, and numerical K I is equal to74.576 MPa √ m, this test showed a very slight decrease in FEA stress intensity factor compared to that in an experimental result which means the stress intensity factor, K I remains very close between experimental and numerical with an error percentage of about (1.12 %). The finite element analysis provides the best approximation to true fracture toughness values, and it can be used to acquire close parameters if experimental testing is not possible.