Cover
Vol. 25 No. 2 (2025)

Published: December 31, 2025

Pages: 91-99

Original Article

Optimization of Turbidity Removal from Domestic Wastewater by Electrocoagulation Using Aluminum Electrodes: A Design of Experiments Approach

Abstract

A significant quantity of pollutants are contained within domestic wastewater which creates a substantial environmental issue with a large quantity of effluent that contains high amounts of contaminants. Turbidity is a major indicator of water quality and a measure of suspended solids. The purpose of this investigation was to study the use of electrocoagulation (EC) as a method of removing turbidity from municipal wastewater using aluminum electrodes. Using a Design of Experiments (DOE) approach, specifically Response Surface Methodology (RSM), the effect of three important operating variables was studied. These were: the initial pH of the wastewater in the range from 3 to 9; the current (or amperage, ranged from 0.1 A to 1.1 A); and the time for which the wastewater was treated by the EC process (ranged from 10 minutes to 20 minutes). The initial turbidity of each of the municipal wastewaters used in the testing remained constant at 336 NTU (nephelometric turbidity units) throughout the entire investigation. The effect of a number of different experiments was made in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the EC process for removing turbidity from the municipal wastewaters, and in addition take a measure of a predictive model of turbidity removal efficiency. The main conclusion drawn from the investigation was that the EC process will be very effective for removing turbidity from municipal wastewaters, which can vary from 5% removal to total removal (as high as 97%). There appeared to be a statistical correlation between the removal efficiency and the three experimental variables: pH (r=0.4316); amperage (r=0.3714); and time of treatment (r=0.3965). The removal efficiency was highest using the variables of Run 8 whereby the pH was equal to 9, the current was held constant at 0.6 A and the treatment time was 10 minutes, resulting in a turbidity removal efficiency of 97%. The various data showed that both slightly acid (pH=6) and alkaline (pH=9) gave a markedly superior removal than acid (pH=3) for obtaining constant, high removal efficiencies (average of 90.00% and 90.33%, respectively). Also, it was determined that a current of 0.6 A provided the most optimum amperage, giving an average removal efficiency of 95.33%. In addition, it was shown that long treatment times resulted in high removal efficiency, with the most averages of removal efficiencies recorded when the time of treatment was set.

References

  1. I. Tabash, H. Elnakar, M. F. Khan, "Optimization of iron electrocoagulation parameters for enhanced turbidity and chemical oxygen demand removal from laundry greywater", Scientific Reports, Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 16468, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67425-8
  2. G. H. Bracher, E. Carissimi, D. B. Wolff, C. Graepin, A. P. Hubner, "Optimization of an electrocoagulation-flotation system for domestic wastewater treatment and reuse", Environmental Technology, Vol. 42, No. 17, pp. 2669-2679, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1709905
  3. A. Reza, S. Haller, X. Mao, "Electrocoagulation as a Remedial Approach for Phosphorus Removal from Onsite Wastewater: A Review", Water, Vol. 16, No. 22, p. 3206, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223206
  4. A. A. Bukhari, "Investigation of the electro-coagulation treatment process for the removal of total suspended solids and turbidity from municipal wastewater", Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99, No. 5, pp. 914-921, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.015
  5. S. Karimifard, M. R. A. Moghaddam, "Application of response surface methodology in physicochemical removal of dyes from wastewater: a critical review", Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 640, pp. 772-797, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.355
  6. M. Mousazadeh, N. Khademi, I. Kabdaşlı, S. Rezaei, Z. Hajalifard, Z. Moosakhani, K. Hashim, "Domestic greywater treatment using electrocoagulation-electrooxidation process: optimization and experimental approaches", Scientific Reports, Vol. 13, No. 1, p. 15852, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42831-6
  7. P. K. Holt, G. W. Barton, C. A. Mitchell, "The future for electrocoagulation as localised water treatment technology", Chemosphere, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 355-367, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.023
  8. O. Sahu, B. Mazumdar, P. K. Chaudhari, "Treatment of wastewater by electrocoagulation: a review", Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 2397-2413, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2208-6
  9. F. Janpoor, A. Torabian, V. Khatibikamal, "Treatment of laundry waste-water by electrocoagulation", Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, Vol. 86, No. 8, pp. 1113-1120, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2625
  10. F. Ozyonar, B. Karagozoglu, "Operating cost analysis and treatment of domestic wastewater by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes", Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 173-179, 2011.
  11. A. A. Moneer, W. M. Thabet, M. Khedawy, M. M. El-Sadaawy, N. A. Shaaban, "Electrocoagulation process for oily wastewater treatment and optimization using response surface methodology", International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 20, No. 12, pp. 13859-13872, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05003-7
  12. I. Kabdaşlı, I. Arslan-Alaton, T. Ölmez-Hancı, O. Tünay, "Electrocoagulation applications for industrial wastewaters: a critical review", Environmental Technology Reviews, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 2-45, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2012.715390
  13. V. Kuokkanen, T. Kuokkanen, J. Rämö, U. Lassi, J. Roininen, "Removal of phosphate from wastewaters for further utilization using electrocoagulation with hybrid electrodes-Techno-economic studies", Journal of Water Process Engineering, Vol. 8, pp. e50-e57, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.11.008
  14. M. K. N. Mahmad, M. M. R. Rozainy, I. Abustan, N. Baharun, "Electrocoagulation process by using aluminium and stainless steel electrodes to treat total chromium, colour and turbidity", Procedia Chemistry, Vol. 19, pp. 681-686, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.070
  15. S. Tchamango, C. P. Nanseu-Njiki, E. Ngameni, D. Hadjiev, A. Darchen, "Treatment of dairy effluents by electrocoagulation using aluminium electrodes", Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 408, No. 4, pp. 947-952, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.026
  16. M. J. Mohammadi, J. Salari, A. Takdastan, M. Farhadi, P. Javanmardi, A. R. Yari, S. Rahimi, "Removal of turbidity and organic matter from car wash wastewater by electrocoagulation process", Desalination and Water Treatment, Vol. 68, pp. 122-128, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20319
  17. T. R. Devlin, M. S. Kowalski, E. Pagaduan, X. Zhang, V. Wei, J. A. Oleszkiewicz, "Electrocoagulation of wastewater using aluminum, iron, and magnesium electrodes", Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 368, pp. 862-868, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.017
  18. B. Yazıcı Karabulut, "Electrochemical Coagulant Generation via Aluminum-Based Electrocoagulation for Sustainable Greywater Treatment and Reuse: Optimization Through Response Surface Methodology and Kinetic Modelling", Molecules, Vol. 30, No. 18, p. 3779, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30183779
  19. A. S. Naje, S. Chelliapan, Z. Zakaria, M. A. Ajeel, P. A. Alaba, "A review of electrocoagulation technology for the treatment of textile wastewater", Reviews in Chemical Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 263-292, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2016-0019
  20. A. Reza, S. Haller, X. Mao, "Electrocoagulation as a Remedial Approach for Phosphorus Removal from Onsite Wastewater: A Review", Water, Vol. 16, No. 22, p. 3206, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223206
  21. M. E. Bote, W. M. Desta, "Removal of turbidity from domestic wastewater using electrocoagulation: optimization with response surface methodology", Chemistry Africa, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 123-134, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-021-00303-2
  22. E. Jafari, M. R. Malayeri, H. Brückner, P. Krebs, "Impact of operating parameters of electrocoagulation-flotation on the removal of turbidity from synthetic wastewater using aluminium electrodes", Minerals Engineering, Vol. 193, p. 108007, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108007
  23. M. Bayramoglu, M. Eyvaz, M. Kobya, "Treatment of the textile wastewater by electrocoagulation: economical evaluation", Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 128, No. 2-3, pp. 155-161, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.10.008
  24. S. Y. Lee, G. A. Gagnon, "Review of the factors relevant to the design and operation of an electrocoagulation system for wastewater treatment", Environmental Reviews, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 421-429, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2014-0009
  25. O. Chavalparit, M. Ongwandee, "Optimizing electrocoagulation process for the treatment of biodiesel wastewater using response surface methodology", Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 11, pp. 1491-1496, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62445-6
  26. M. Tir, N. Moulai-Mostefa, "Optimization of oil removal from oily wastewater by electrocoagulation using response surface method", Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 158, No. 1, pp. 107-115, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.051
  27. T. Karichappan, S. Venkatachalam, P. M. Jeganathan, "Optimization of electrocoagulation process to treat grey wastewater in batch mode using response surface methodology", Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 1, p. 29, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-29
  28. M. Ebba, P. Asaithambi, E. Alemayehu, "Development of electrocoagulation process for wastewater treatment: optimization by response surface methodology", Heliyon, Vol. 8, No. 5, p. e09383, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09383
  29. G. Varank, M. E. Sabuncu, "Application of Central Composite Design approach for dairy wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation using iron and aluminum electrodes: modeling and optimization", Desalination and Water Treatment, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 33-54, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.934731
  30. S. R. Kamal, M. K. Kumar, "Removal of COD and turbidity from urban wastewater by electrocoagulation using aluminium electrodes: process optimization by response surface methodology", International Journal of Aquatic Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 779-798, 2021.
  31. G. H. Bracher, E. Carissimi, D. B. Wolff, A. G. Glusczak, C. Graepin, "Performance of an electrocoagulation-flotation system in the treatment of domestic wastewater for urban reuse", Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29, No. 32, pp. 49439-49456, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20630-2
  32. S. Koyuncu, S. Arıman, "Domestic wastewater treatment by real-scale electrocoagulation process", Water Science and Technology, Vol. 81, No. 4, pp. 656-667, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.128
  33. K. Ulucan, H. A. Kabuk, F. Ilhan, U. Kurt, "Electrocoagulation process application in bilge water treatment using response surface methodology", International Journal of Electrochemical Science, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 2316-2326, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1452-3981(23)07929-4
  34. M. Bayramoglu, M. Kobya, M. Eyvaz, E. Senturk, "Technical and economic analysis of electrocoagulation for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater", Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 404-408, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.03.003
  35. V. Kuokkanen, "Utilization of electrocoagulation for water and wastewater treatment and nutrient recovery: techno-economic studies", University of Oulu Graduate School, 2016.