Cover
Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)

Published: February 29, 2024

Pages: 140-145

Original Article

Seismic Analysis of Concrete Folded Plates

Abstract

Concrete roof-folded plates have been shown to be inherently resilient to earthquakes, despite limited research on the reasons for their apparent seismic resistance. It is possible to make very thin, folded concrete plates because of their high structural efficiency. It is implicitly resistant to earthquake forces because thin, folded plat structures are relatively lightweight. Typically, folded plate structures are designed to perform under ideal gravity loads that are transported primarily as a result of membrane activity across the surface. It is possible for concrete-folded plate structures to be damaged by bending stresses when earthquakes induce unexpected horizontal forces. Through a parametric analysis of an 8-cm-thick concrete roof folded plate structure, it has been shown that thin concrete roof folded plates with a span < 30 m can be intrinsically earthquake-resistant. Despite having a low mass and high geometric stiffness, these buildings have fundamental frequencies that are substantially higher than those connected to seismic events that actually occur. This characteristic causes the folded plate to behave elastically under earthquake excitation without exceeding the maximum concrete strength. The vertical components of earthquake vibrations exert greater stress on a shallow, folded plate than the horizontal components. The values of the stresses imposed by the changing span were relatively small. They ranged from (3.5-4.4) MPa for the Landers earthquake, while for the El Centro earthquake, they ranged from (2.7-8.6) MPa. In addition, by raising the folded big plates and inclining them to a greater angle, it will become more common and lessen the harm caused by earthquake shaking in the vertical direction. In general, this paper aims to present an examination of earthquakes and their consequences for folded concrete plates.

References

  1. M. S. Saiidi and M. A. Sozen, “Simple Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of R/C Structures,” Journal of the Structural Division, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 937–953, May 1981.
  2. S. Otani, H. Hiraishi, M. Midorikawa, and and M. Teshigawara, “New Seismic Design Provisions in Japan,” SP-197: S.M. Uzumeri Symposium - Behavior and Design of Concrete Structures for Seismic Performance, Jan. 2002.
  3. P. Fajfar, Damjan Marušić, and Iztok Peruš, “Torsional Effects in the Pushover-Based Seismic Analysis of Buildings,” Journal of earthquake engineering, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 831–854, Nov. 2005.
  4. ANSYS. Workbench User’s Guide 2021 R2- ANSYS, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates.
  5. S. I. khassaf, A. H. Chkheiwr, M. A. Jasim, “Effect of Crest Shape on the Structural Performance of the Double Curvature Concrete Dam,” International journal of GEOMATE, Geotechnique, construction materials and environment, vol. 20, no. 78, pp. 9-19, Feb. 2021.
  6. P. C. Varghese, Design of reinforced concrete shells and folded plates, New Delhi: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., 2010. ISBN 8120341112, 9788120341111
  7. Association of Consulting Engineering, “BSI-8110-97 structural use of concrete”, British standard Institute, 1997. ISBN-0-580-26208-1
  8. ACI Committee 318. “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19): An ACI Standard; Commentary on Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318R-19)”, American Concrete Institute, 2020.
  9. A. H. Adheem, “Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete beams strengthened in shear with NSM FRP rods”, Journal of Babylon University/Engineering Sciences, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 160-173, 2013.
  10. T. Michiels and S. Adriaenssens, “Identification of key design parameters for earthquake resistance of reinforced concrete shell structures,” Engineering Structures, vol. 153, pp. 411–420, Dec. 2017.
  11. FEMA 356, Federal Emergency. “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings”, Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  12. N. A. Jasim and MohammedF. Ojaimi, “Effect of Stiffening System on Building Resistance to Earthquake Forces,” IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, vol. 14, no. 01, pp. 09-22, Jan. 2017.
  13. J. Baqersad, P. Poozesh, C. Niezrecki, P. Avitabile, “Comparison of Modal Parameters Extracted Using MIMO, SIMO, and Impact Hammer Tests on a ThreeBladed Wind Turbine”, Modal Analysis II, Volume 8. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, Springer, Cham, 2014.
  14. H. K. Jarallah, “Effects of coupling between lateral and torsional motions in seismic response of buildings”, Basrah Journal for Engineering Sciences, vol. 18, Issue 1, pp. 1530, 2018. https://doi.org/10.33971/bjes.18.1.3