Cover
Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024)

Published: February 29, 2024

Pages: 127-139

Original Article

The Impact of Façade Design on Visual Pollution

Abstract

Visual pollution refers to the negative impact of various environmental elements on the visual experience of individuals and the quality of the surroundings. This includes unsightly buildings and other man-made structures that disrupt natural beauty. The design of building facades plays a significant role in determining visual pollution. This study aimed to assess the impact of facade design on visual pollution by testing which facade design considerations most contribute to visual pollution in Peshawa-Qazi Street (100 m) in Erbil City. An online survey was conducted with 283 participants in six architectural departments within engineering colleges and other online engineering platforms in Erbil, Duhok, and Suleimani. Respondents included architectural students from the 3rd to 5th stage, academic staff, and professional architects. They rated the impact of individual facade elements, contextual integration, and other factors on visual pollution. A one-sample T-test was used to compare mean scores to a test value of (2.5). Results showed that all three categories of façade design considerations significantly increase visual pollution compared to the test value (p < 0.05). Considerations regarding the overall context of a facade had the most significant impact (mean of 1.93 higher than the test value), followed by other factors (mean of 1.79 higher) and individual elements (mean of 0.71 higher). To decrease visual pollution, it is recommended to the policymakers and municipalities to develop regulations, façade design guidelines and for architects to follow the principles of architectural form and composition regarding the integration of building facades with their surroundings, façade practical considerations, and refined composition of façade elements.

References

  1. R. Keshtkaran, A. Habibi, and H. Sharif, “Aesthetic Preferences for Visual Quality of Urban Landscape in Derak High-Rise Buildings (Shiraz),” J Sustain Dev, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 94, 2017.
  2. O. J. Oludare, I. C. Ezema., and A. B. Adeboye, “Visual Quality Assessment of Covenant University Senate Building Façade,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 665, no. 1, p. 12018, 2021.
  3. M. Malewczyk, A. Taraszkiewicz, and P. Czyż, “Preferences of the Facade Composition in the Context of Its Regularity and Irregularity,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 169, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020169
  4. S. A. Bakar, Ammar al-Sharaa, Suhardi Maulan, and Riyadh Munther, “Measuring Visual Pollution Threshold along Kuala Lumpur Historic Shopping District Streets Using Cumulative Area Analysis,” Jan. 2019.
  5. L. K. Shaban, S. Suleiman, D. Abdel-Aziz, and H. Y. Isawi, “Evaluating the Visual Pollution in Urban Corridors-Case of Al-Madina Al-Munawara Corridor, Amman,” Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 288–294, 2018. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.15.5914
  6. A. M. Shatwan, “Visual Pollution and the Architecture of Façade Design: A Case Study in Jeddah,” Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Engineering & Architecture (Association of Arab Universities), vol 12, Issue 2, p. 26 2021.
  7. A. Prieto and M. Oldenhave, “What makes a façade beautiful? Architects’ Perspectives on the Main Aspects That Inform Aesthetic Preferences in Façade Design”, Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 21–46, Jul. 2021.
  8. K. A. Jennath and P. J. Nidhish, “Aesthetic Judgement and Visual Impact of Architectural Forms: A Study of Library Buildings,” Procedia Technology, vol. 24, pp. 1808–1818, Jan. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.226
  9. M. M. Naguib, “Visual pollution caused by banners and signage installed on buildings facades Case study: Alexandria versus Moscow city,” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, vol. 7, no. 8, 2016.
  10. R. Saraiji and M. S. Oommen, “Light Pollution Index (LPI): An Integrated Approach to Study Light Pollution with Street Lighting and Façade Lighting,” LEUKOS, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 127–145, 2012.
  11. A. H. Hussein and M. A. Al-Anbari, “Evaluation of some visual pollution indicators of Bab Al-Hussein commercial street in Al-Hilla city,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2787, No. 1, Jan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0148201
  12. A. H. Askari and K. B. Dola, “Influence of Building Façade Visual Elements on Its Historical Image: Case of Kuala Lumpur City, Malaysia,” Journal of Design and Built Environment, vol. 5, no. 1, 2009.
  13. D. Yilmaz and A. Sagsoz, “In the Context of Visual Pollution: Effects to Trabzon City Center Silhoutte,” Asian Social Science, vol. 7, no. 5, Apr. 2011.
  14. M. Ghomeshi, M. Nikpour, and M. M. Jusan, “Identifying the different aesthetic quality of building attributes from architects perspectives”, International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER), vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 917-919, 2012.
  15. R. Gifford, D. W. Hine, W. Muller-Clemm, D. J. Reynolds, and K. T. Shaw, “Decoding Modern Architecture: A Lens Model Approach for Understanding the Aesthetic Differences of Architects and Laypersons,” Environ Behav, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 163–187, 2000.
  16. O. A. Sabah, and M. M. Hanim, “Penang/Georgetown's Shophouse Facade and Visual Problems, Analytic Study”, In Proceeding ICOLASS, vol. 16, pp. 96-105, 2016.
  17. M. Pecht and K. Yildirim, “Perceptual Evaluation of Traditional Turkish House Façade,” ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 742–768, Dec. 2021.
  18. I. H. EL-Ghonaimy, “Visual pollution phenomena and sensitivity of residences in heritage city centers Case of: Old district of Manama city, Kingdom of Bahrain,” Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 175–190, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.4694
  19. S. S. Sayed Elleithi, H. Layeb, A. Assassi, and A. Mebarki, “The Effect of Visual Pollution on the Bases of the Visual Formation of the Collective Dwellings Facades Case Study: The Evolutionary Neighborhood Batna, Algeria,” International Journal of Innovative Studies in Sociology and Humanities, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 118–129, 2022. https://doi.org/10.20431/2456-4931.0706012
  20. M. Ghomeshi and M. M. Jusan, “Investigating Different Aesthetic Preferences Between Architects and Nonarchitects in Residential Façade Designs,” Indoor and Built Environment, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 952–964, Sep. 2012.
  21. R. Bhatnagar, J. Kim, and J. E. Many, “Candidate Surveys on Program Evaluation: Examining Instrument Reliability, Validity and Program Effectiveness,” American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 683–690, Aug. 2014. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-8-18
  22. A. Fodah, H. Abu-Mohammed, and M. Kasim, “Argumentative outer shell facades design of the building from the perspective of improving the quality of design”, International Journal of Architecture Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 87– 98, 2019.
  23. A guide to site and environmental planning (2nd edn.): Harvey M. Rubenstein. John Wiley and sons, New York, NY, 1980, 252 pp., £15.80, ISBN 0-471-04729-5, Landscape Planning, vol.8, Issue 3, 1981.
  24. L. N. Groat, “Carbuncles, Columns, and Pyramids: Lay and Expert Evaluations of Contextual Design Strategies,” Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 156–164, Jan. 1994.
  25. R. M. Stapleton, “Visual Pollution”, Retrieved 22 August, 2008. http://www.pollutionissues.com/Ve-Z/Visual-Pollution.html
  26. A. Ashadi, “Positioning Architecture in Culture,” DIMENSI, Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 27–34, Jun. 2021.
  27. H. Allahyari, S. Nasehi, E. Salehi, and L. Zebardast, “Evaluation of visual pollution in urban squares, using SWOT, AHP, and QSPM techniques (Case study: Tehran squares of Enghelab and Vanak),” Pollution, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 655–667, Oct. 2017.