Cover
Vol. 22 No. 1 (2022)

Published: April 30, 2022

Pages: 48-57

Original Article

Comparison the Hydraulic Harvested Energy with the Electromagnetic Systems and the Spent Energy on the Active System

Murtadha Q. Dinar 1 Haider J. Abid 2 Hassanein I. Khalaf 1
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Thi-Qar, Thi-Qar, Iraq
History
  • Received: November 20, 2021
  • Revised: December 10, 2021
  • Accepted: December 15, 2021
  • Available Online: April 24, 2022
DOI

https://doi.org/10.33971/bjes.22.1.6

Abstract

An energy-harvesting hydraulic regeneration suspension system is described in this article, which includes a hydraulic motor, a spool valves, and a hydraulic cylinder. Regenerative actuators are built using a hydraulic transmission system as their inspiration. The proposed regenerative actuator is implemented in the vehicle's non-linear suspension system for a complete model. MATLAB Simulink is utilized to generate and simulate the entire vehicle's regenerative suspension system, which has force properties which are nonlinear with hydraulic actuators equations with energy harvesting from regenerative actuators. During the mathematical simulation, the effect of pressure differential on the spool valve's operation is also taken into account. The quantity of captured energy is compared to the energy expended on the active actuator and the energy generated with the electromagnetic actuator at three distinct input signals at three different pressure level (10, 30 and 50 bars) (random, sinusoidal, and square). The energy generated in the regenerative hydraulic actuator at three pressure levels behaves the same as the active actuator in terms of response, plus the highest pressure of 50 bar is closely comparable to the active system in terms of energy harvest and gradually decreases as the output pressure drops in addition to the behavior of the electromagnetic and its comparison with the wasted energy of the active system.

Keywords

References

  1. D. Karnopp, “Permanent Magnet Linear Motors Used as Variable Mechanical Dampers for Vehicle Suspensions”, Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 18, Issue 4, PP. 187-200, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423118908968918
  2. Y. Okada, and H. Harada, “Regenerative Control of Active Vibration Damper and Suspension Systems”, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan, Vol. 4., pp. 4715-4720, 1996.
  3. Y. Suda, and T. Shiiba, “A New Hybrid Suspension System with Active Control and Energy Regeneration”, Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 25, Issue Sup1, pp. 641654, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119608969226
  4. M. Q. Dinar, H. J. Abid, and H. I. Khalaf, “Enhanced the Damping Efficiency of Hydraulic Regenerative Suspension System Comparing with the Active and Passive Suspension Systems”, Advances in Mechanics, Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 108-125, 2021.
  5. C. Shian, H. Ren, and L. Senlin, “New Reclaiming Energy Suspension and its Working Principle”, Chines Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 11, pp. 177-182, 2007.
  6. H. Ren, C. Shian, and L. Senlin, “A Permanent Magnetic Energy Regenerative Suspension”, ZL 200520072480.9, 2005.
  7. C. Shian, H. Ren, and L. Senlin, “Operation Theory and Structure Evaluation of Reclaiming Energy Suspension”, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 5-9, 2006.
  8. Z. Yong-chao, U. Fan, G. Yong-hui, and Z. Xue-chun, “Isolation and Energy regenerative Performance Experimental Verification of Automotive Electrical Suspension”, Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 874-877, 2008.
  9. L. Zheng, Y. N. Li, J. Shao, and X. S. Sun, “The Design of a Fuzzy-sliding Mode Controller of Semi-active Suspension Systems with MR Dampers”, Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2007), pp. 514-518, 2007.
  10. F. A. Ansari, R. Taparia, “Modeling, analysis and control of active suspension system using sliding mode control and disturbance observer”, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp.1-6, 2013.
  11. Z. Fang, X. Guo, L. Xu, and H. Zhang, “Experimental Study of Damping and Energy Regeneration Characteristics of a Hydraulic Electromagnetic Shock Absorber”, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 5, pp. 1-9, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/943528
  12. C. Li, R. Zhu, M. Liang, and Sh. Yang, “Integration of Shock Absorption and Energy Harvesting Using a Hydraulic Rectifier”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 333, Issue 17, pp. 3904-3916, 2014.
  13. L. Xu, Y. Liu, S. Guo, X. Guo and L. Zuo, “Damping Characteristics of a Hydraulic Electric Rectifier Shock Absorber and Its Effect on Vehicle Dynamics”, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2016, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2015-46916
  14. S. Guo, L. Xu, Y. Liu, M. Liu, X. Guo and L. Zuo, “Modeling, Experiments, and Parameter Sensitivity Analysis of Hydraulic Electromagnetic Shock Absorber”, ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, 2016, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-60390
  15. S. Guo, L. Xu , Y. Liu, X. Guo and L. Zuo, “Modeling and Experiments of a Hydraulic Electromagnetic Energy Harvesting Shock Absorber”, IEEE/ ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 2684-2694, 2017.
  16. Y. Zhang, H. Chen, K. Guo, X. Zhang, and Sh. E. Li, “Electro-hydraulic Damper for Energy Harvesting Suspension: Modeling, Prototyping and Experimental Validation”, Applied Energy, Vol. 199, pp. 1-12, 2017.
  17. P. Li, and L. Zuo, “Equivalent Circuit Modeling of Vehicle Dynamics with Regenerative Shock Absorbers”, ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2013, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-12759
  18. S. Guo, Y. Lui, L. Xu, X. Guo and L. Zuo, “Performance Evaluation and Parameter Sensitivity of Energy-harvesting Shock Absorbers on Different Vehicles,” Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 54, Issue 7, pp. 918-942, 2016.
  19. L. Xu, Y. Liu, S. Guo, X. Guo, and L. Zuo, “Damping Characteristics of a Hydraulic Electric Rectifier Shock Absorber and Its Effect on Vehicle Dynamics”, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2016, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2015-46916
  20. A. A. Aldair, “Neurofuzzy Controller Based Full Vehicle Nonlinear Active Suspension Systems”, Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, University of Sussex, April 2012. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/38502
  21. A. A. Aldair and E. B. Alsaedee, “Regeneration Energy for Nonlinear Active Suspension System Using Electromagnetic Actuator”, Iraqi Journal for Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 113-125, 2020. https://doi.org/10.37917/ijeee.16.2.12